Subject	I'd go 245 or less on front for ease of low speed steering
Posted by	Gordo 93TT Daytona on January 25, 2012 at 9:37 AM
	This message has been viewed 249 times.
In Reply To	Re: why such sissy tire sizes? posted by Tanley on January 25, 2012 at 05:42 AM
Message	unless you are going to track the car. IMO Anything more than than that begins to become a nuisance and is strictly for show. I have 275 on the rears and find the F/R balance is good. Lots of guys are at 285 and swear they need more! Unless you are putting down 450+ at the rear wheels, I don't see the need. _________________________________________________
Follow Ups	Staggered Wheels - Tanley 20:29:32 01/24/12 Re: Staggered Wheels - ZwheelZ 20:57:25 01/24/12 why such sissy tire sizes? - Antihero 23:12:38 01/24/12 Re: why such sissy tire sizes? - Tanley 05:42:21 01/25/12 I'd go 245 or less on front for ease of low speed steering - Gordo 93TT Daytona 09:37:29 01/25/12 What? Do you still have the power steering system? - Antihero 09:43:45 01/25/12 LOL I knew I'd catch some flak for that post!! Seriously - Gordo 93TT Daytona 09:55:26 01/25/12 I tend to agree 255 is ALOT of tire upfront. Just my opinion - new2boost 10:29:12 01/25/12 ever try going back to back? - Antihero 10:31:15 01/25/12 Not back to back, but I have driven two cars within a few - Gordo 93TT Daytona 11:09:04 01/25/12 I think its hard to isolate the issue to the tires - Antihero 11:36:56 01/25/12 Staggered Wheels - Tanley 11:50:04 01/25/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.